They embody candidates for the U.S. Home and Senate, and the state places of work of governor, secretary of state and legal professional basic — many with clear photographs to victory, and a few with no likelihood. They’re united by no less than one concern: They’ve all expressed doubt in regards to the legitimacy of the 2020 election. And they’re the brand new regular of the Republican Occasion.
Concerning the information Karen Yourish and Danielle Ivory collected and analyzed statements of greater than 550 Republican midterm candidates. Learn extra about their reporting.
Greater than 370 folks — a overwhelming majority of Republicans working for these places of work in November — have questioned and, at instances, outright denied the outcomes of the 2020 election regardless of overwhelming proof on the contrary, in accordance with a monthslong New York Occasions investigation. These candidates symbolize a sentiment that’s spreading within the Republican Occasion, rupturing a bedrock precept of democracy: that voters determine elections and candidates settle for outcomes.
This skepticism has stretched into political races in each state and continues to be continuously being raised as a marketing campaign concern, The Occasions has discovered, almost two years after Donald J. Trump was defeated. A whole bunch of those candidates are favored to win their races.
Every dot represents a Republican candidate for U.S. Congress, governor, secretary of state or state legal professional basic. Candidate questioned the 2020 election even in 2022Candidate questioned the 2020 election earlier than 2022Times discovered no proof
Removed from fading over time, as many Individuals had hoped, election lies and misinformation have proved strikingly resilient, even amid a political marketing campaign season wherein way more is being stated by candidates and their occasion officers about points like inflation and abortion. The Occasions has for the primary time recognized greater than 240 candidates who’re nonetheless casting doubt on the presidential election this yr — a lot of them inside the final couple of months.
The Occasions evaluation is an in depth accounting of the unfold of election denial within the Republican Occasion. The evaluation incorporates not solely what candidates have stated, but in addition when. Many candidates’ views have modified over time — as new conspiracies had been born, as Mr. Trump demanded fealty, and as main voters weighed in, The Occasions discovered. Some candidates turned much less vocal after the Capitol riot, and a few have constantly pushed falsehoods in regards to the election.
The timeline beneath tracks the candidates’ expressions of doubt over three distinct intervals: on the day of or earlier than the Jan. 6 Capitol riot, after the riot, and this yr because the midterm elections have approached.
Every row represents a candidate. Every column represents a time interval.
74 candidates questioned the 2020 election by way of the Jan. 6 Capitol riot.
On or beforeJan. 6, 2021
Remainder of 2021
2022
Michael Cloud, twenty seventh District, Texas“The allegations of irregularities within the vote-counting course of must be regarding to everybody.”— Nov. 6, 2020
136 candidates questioned the 2020 election on and off within the final two years.
On or beforeJan. 6, 2021
Remainder of 2021
2022
Diana Harshbarger, First District, Tenn.“There’s ample proof that unchecked poll harvesting has led to mischief and voting irregularities.”— June 24, 2022
64 candidates questioned the 2020 election in 2022.
On or beforeJan. 6, 2021
Remainder of 2021
2022
Scotty Moore, Ninth District, Fla.“The film ‘2000 Mules’ proves election fraud occurred and President Trump received in a landslide.”— Might 9, 2022
103 candidates have persistently questioned the 2020 election.
On or beforeJan. 6, 2021
Remainder of 2021
2022
Mary Miller, fifteenth District, Unwell.“They know even a glancing overview would uncover the best heist of the twenty first century.”— Dec. 29, 2020
Notice: Some candidates weren’t public figures till not too long ago. Their information of casting doubt on the 2020 election might not be publicly accessible.
No proof of widespread irregularities was discovered by high Trump administration officers within the Justice Division and the Division of Homeland Safety, which investigated the election, or by judges all through the nation and even auditors commissioned by political operatives intent on proving fraud.
The Occasions scoured the general public information of greater than 550 Republican candidates in all 50 states, analyzing their social media accounts, political emails, newsletters, speeches, interviews and marketing campaign supplies. The evaluation distinguished between the various dozens of candidates who stated unequivocally (and inaccurately) that the 2020 election was stolen, and people who stopped wanting that falsehood however criticized the election, typically persistently, in ways in which had been seemingly extra affordable however maybe extra influential.
The Occasions didn’t mechanically categorize candidates who objected to the 2020 Electoral Faculty outcomes or who supported lawsuits difficult the outcomes as denying the election outright. As a latest Occasions investigation reported, these candidates typically cited extra nuanced arguments for his or her votes or stated they didn’t need to overturn the end result.
The Worth of Entry Into the G.O.P.
The Occasions investigation discovered that about 70 % of Republicans working for Congress had questioned the election of President Biden, who received seven million extra votes and 74 extra electors than Mr. Trump. Of these, almost two-thirds are favored to win their races, in accordance with the Cook dinner Political Report, which supplies race scores for Congress and governor.
Republican candidates for Congresswho questioned the 2020 election Favored to winNot favored to winTimes discovered no proof
Amongst Republican candidates working for state places of work that may play a major function in elections and recounts — governors, attorneys basic and secretaries of state — greater than half expressed misgivings in regards to the 2020 election. The share was increased, about 65 %, amongst candidates working for governor. About half of these candidates for governor are favored to win.
Republican candidates for governor, secretary of state and legal professional generalCandidate questioned the 2020 electionTimes discovered no proof
For Republican candidates who would relatively speak about one thing apart from the final presidential election, some have discovered that the occasion’s base, and its unofficial chief, Mr. Trump, received’t allow them to drop the problem. It has develop into, in lots of instances, the worth of entry to the Republican ticket.
Wisconsin Republicans discovered this lesson the arduous approach.
In early June, Mr. Trump upended the Republican main for governor in Wisconsin by endorsing Tim Michels, a rich building magnate, over Rebecca Kleefisch, a former lieutenant governor of the state and a favourite of native Republicans.
The endorsement apparently got here with strings.
Throughout a July debate, Mr. Michels stated he wouldn’t prioritize decertifying the 2020 election in Wisconsin, a legally implausible course of that nonetheless remained a fixation of Mr. Trump.
“I’ve to concentrate on beating Tony Evers this fall,” he stated, referring to Wisconsin’s incumbent Democratic governor.
A roar got here from Mar-a-Lago, communicated by way of aides to Mr. Michels, demanding that he embrace the decertification motion, in accordance with folks acquainted with the conversations.
Mr. Michels reversed course, saying that he was “very, very fired up about this election integrity concern” and pledging to think about signing a decertification invoice if legislators handed one.
By the ultimate days of the first, Mr. Michels was selling the election conspiracy idea amplified within the movie “2000 Mules” and was promising to think about signing laws clawing again Wisconsin’s 10 electoral votes from the 2020 election.
The previous president has backed almost 70 % of the candidates that The Occasions recognized as questioning the 2020 election and who’re favored to win their races.
Who Is Sowing Doubt — and How
Of the greater than 370 candidates who expressed skepticism in regards to the 2020 election, about half are incumbents, almost all of whom are favored to maintain their seats.
A couple of fifth of the candidates are present members of Congress who, on Jan. 6, 2021, objected to the Electoral Faculty outcomes — a distinction that, in accordance with a latest Occasions report, has develop into politically (and financially) worthwhile.
Within the months following the Capitol riot, almost 80 % of the objectors who’re working for re-election took some type of official motion that, in impact, continued to advertise questions in regards to the 2020 election. These included signing congressional letters alleging widespread fraud or inappropriate interference within the 2020 race; co-sponsoring laws to repair what they deemed to be issues that emerged throughout that election; and becoming a member of a brand new Election Integrity Caucus, which has spearheaded a variety of these initiatives.
The candidates recognized by The Occasions embody individuals who have questioned the 2020 election in methods each express and refined.
Fewer than one-third have staked out essentially the most excessive place — stating, with none proof, that the election was stolen or rigged.
Republican candidates by workplace Candidate brazenly stated the 2020 election was stolenCandidate questioned the 2020 election in different waysTimes discovered no proof
An excellent smaller variety of the candidates who explicitly stated the election was stolen, about three dozen of them, are favored to win. They embody incumbents like Governor Kay Ivey of Alabama, Consultant Lance Gooden of Texas and Consultant Matt Gaetz of Florida — all of whom have tweeted falsely, typically repeatedly, that the election was stolen — in addition to candidates working for the Home, like Mike Collins in Georgia, Joe Kent in Washington State and Anna Paulina Luna in Florida.
In a latest video, Mr. Collins walks towards the digicam with a gun, saying: “You depend the authorized votes that had been forged within the state of Georgia? Donald Trump received this state, interval.” On the finish of the video, he shoots what seems to be a voting machine, and it explodes. Mr. Biden received the election in Georgia by greater than 11,000 votes.
The video beneath reveals how a number of the most ardent election deniers have made their claims, despite the fact that Mr. Biden acquired greater than 51 % of the favored vote, profitable in battleground states like Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, Minnesota, Nevada, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin.
Mark Finchem for Ariz. Secretary of State “We all know it and so they comprehend it.
Mark Finchem for Ariz. Secretary of State Donald Trump received.”
Brian Flowers for Miss. 2 “Trump received, and everybody is aware of it.”
Blake Masters for Ariz. Senator “I feel Trump received in 2020.”
Mike Collins for Ga. 10 “You depend the authorized votes that had been
Mike Collins for Ga. 10 forged within the state of Georgia.
Mike Collins for Ga. 10 Donald Trump received this state.”
Tudor Dixon for Mich. Governor “Do you imagine Donald Trump legitimately
Tudor Dixon for Mich. Governor received the 2020 election in Michigan?”
Tudor Dixon for Mich. Governor “Sure.”
Anna Paulina Luna for Fla. 13 “Sure, I imagine that
Anna Paulina Luna for Fla. 13 President Trump received that election,
Anna Paulina Luna for Fla. 13 and I do imagine that voter fraud occurred.”
Karoline Leavitt for N.H. 1 “I’m the one candidate on this race
Karoline Leavitt for N.H. 1 to say that President Trump received in 2020.”
Kari Lake for Ariz. Governor “We had a fraudulent election, a corrupt election,
Kari Lake for Ariz. Governor and we’ve got an illegitimate president
Kari Lake for Ariz. Governor sitting within the White Home.”
J.R. Majewski for Ohio 9 “Do you imagine that Joe Biden is the respectable president
J.R. Majewski for Ohio 9 of america?”
J.R. Majewski for Ohio 9 “Hell, no.”
Lisa McClain for Mich. 9 “Inform me Joe Biden received.”
Russell Fry for S.C. 7 “It is rather clear that it was rigged.”
Lance Gooden for Texas 5 “I cannot settle for the outcomes of a rigged election.”
Morgan Luttrell for Texas 8 “It was taken from us.
Morgan Luttrell for Texas 8 Sure, ma’am.”
Jim Bognet for Pa. 8 “In 2020, President Trump endorsed me for Congress.
Jim Bognet for Pa. 8 However that election was stolen from us.”
Marjorie Taylor Greene for Ga. 14 “The soiled, rotten Democrats stole the election.”
Rand Paul for Ky. Senator “The election in some ways was stolen.”
Rayla Campbell for Mass. Secretary of State “We watched our elections
Rayla Campbell for Mass. Secretary of State be stolen.”
J.D. Vance for Ohio Senator “I feel the election was stolen from Trump.”
Kay Ivey for Ala. Governor “The faux information,
Kay Ivey for Ala. Governor Large Tech and blue-state liberals stole the election
Kay Ivey for Ala. Governor from President Trump.”
Most election skeptics, nevertheless, haven’t denied the 2020 outcomes totally. As a substitute, The Occasions discovered, they’ve sown doubt by suggesting, typically repeatedly, that there are unresolved questions or that additional investigation is required.
Some have stated they have no idea who legitimately received the election, or they’ve conceded that Mr. Biden is the president, however not essentially as a result of he was elected pretty. Some have stated that there have been irregularities or interference within the election however that maybe these didn’t change the outcomes.
Others have modified their positions, like Don Bolduc, a Senate candidate in New Hampshire. At an August debate, Mr. Bolduc stated, “I signed a letter with 120 different generals and admirals saying that Trump received the election, and, rattling it, I stand by my letter.”
“I’m not switching horses, child,” he stated.
On Sept. 15, he did.
“I’ve performed a variety of analysis on this,” he stated on Fox Information. “I need to be definitive on this — the election was not stolen.”
On Oct. 3, he staked out what has develop into one thing of a center floor. “I can’t say that it was stolen or not,” he stated. “I don’t have sufficient info.”
Some candidates have bolstered their arguments by evaluating themselves to Democrats who objected to Electoral Faculty ends in 1968, 2000, 2004 and 2016. In these instances, nevertheless, solely small numbers objected, having no sensible impact, and after the shedding Democratic presidential candidates had already conceded.
Others have in contrast themselves to Democrats who stated Russians meddled within the 2016 election. (Conversely, although, U.S. intelligence businesses have decided that Russia did intrude in that election by spreading disinformation.)
Their said causes for doubting the election have fallen alongside a large spectrum, however most have centered on voting procedures and interference.
Quite a lot of candidates have cited issues with voting software program — typically vaguely, typically particularly pointing at debunked conspiracy theories, together with one which falsely claimed machines offered by Dominion Voting Programs had modified votes to sway the election. Others have contended that giant numbers of individuals used the identities of lifeless folks to commit voter fraud, although a number of research have proven that voter impersonation is unusual.
This video reveals the broad menu of rationales utilized by Republican candidates to inaccurately forged doubt on the 2020 election.
John Gibbs for Mich. 3 “I feel if you have a look at the outcomes of the 2020 election,
John Gibbs for Mich. 3 there are anomalies in there, to place it very flippantly,
John Gibbs for Mich. 3 which are merely mathematically unattainable.”
Monica De La Cruz for Texas 15 “The numbers don’t make sense.”
Jim Marchant for Nev. Secretary of State “There are sufficient irregularities that we
Jim Marchant for Nev. Secretary of State have to do an audit.”
Marjorie Taylor Greene for Ga. 14 “They’d the soiled, rotten media inform lies.”
Greg Steube for Fla. 17 “The C.E.O. of Fb admitting that he censored
Greg Steube for Fla. 17 very important info that affected
Greg Steube for Fla. 17 the end result of the election.”
J.D. Vance for Ohio Sentor “They censored, as Mike stated, the Hunter Biden laptop computer
J.D. Vance for Ohio Sentor story, which once more, unbiased analysts
J.D. Vance for Ohio Sentor have stated value Donald Trump thousands and thousands
J.D. Vance for Ohio Sentor upon thousands and thousands of votes.”
Lauren Boebert for Colo. 3 “That’s election interference.”
Harriet Hageman for Wyo. 1 “The ‘2000 Mules’ film is one thing
Harriet Hageman for Wyo. 1 that I feel we’ve got nice concern about in phrases
Harriet Hageman for Wyo. 1 of the usage of the drop containers.”
Mike Lee for Utah Senator “That film does increase vital questions
Mike Lee for Utah Senator as to what may need occurred in that election.”
Kelly Cooper for Ariz. 4 “Poll harvesting invalidates these votes.”
Andrew Clyde for Ga. 9 “One particular person has admitted to being paid $45,000
Andrew Clyde for Ga. 9 to reap 4,500 ballots.
Andrew Clyde for Ga. 9 That’s $10 a poll.”
Scott DesJarlais for Tenn. 4 “Or they didn’t test signatures
Scott DesJarlais for Tenn. 4 or in the event that they did, it could have been
Scott DesJarlais for Tenn. 4 the signature of any individual that stuffed in 100 ballots.
Scott DesJarlais for Tenn. 4 So the signature may need matched,
Scott DesJarlais for Tenn. 4 however they didn’t essentially match an individual.”
Sarah Palin for Alaska 1 “Polling areas needed to produce their voter rolls.
Sarah Palin for Alaska 1 And so they confirmed that there have been, say, extra votes
Sarah Palin for Alaska 1 than there have been voters.”
Clay Higgins for La. 3 “Hundreds of affidavits signed by Americans
Clay Higgins for La. 3 concerning very suspicious election irregularities
Clay Higgins for La. 3 on the times and weeks main as much as the 2020 election.
Clay Higgins for La. 3 And particular surprising observations
Clay Higgins for La. 3 of electoral sabotage on Election Day itself.”
Robert Burns for N.H. 2 “Had been votes stolen?
Robert Burns for N.H. 2 Completely. And do we’ve got a variety of voting points,
Robert Burns for N.H. 2 together with with the voting machines right here in
Robert Burns for N.H. 2 New Hampshire? 100%.”
Mark Alford for Mo. 4 “4 states in our nation
Mark Alford for Mo. 4 went across the Structure to determine their very own guidelines
Mark Alford for Mo. 4 for voting in 2020, based mostly on what I imagine
Mark Alford for Mo. 4 is a man-made virus.”
Lee Zeldin for N.Y. Governor “On high of the thousands and thousands of mailboxes
Lee Zeldin for N.Y. Governor that had been flooded with unrequested mail-in ballots.”
Darren Bailey for Unwell. Governor “All this fraudulent exercise is completely disgusting.
Darren Bailey for Unwell. Governor It’s incorrect.
Darren Bailey for Unwell. Governor It’s, in my view, virtually the best type of treason.”
Mr. Biden’s son has develop into a recurring character in conspiracy theories surrounding the 2020 election.
Lately, an unproven idea that the information media, Fb and Federal Bureau of Investigation colluded to intrude within the 2020 election, maybe to shift the end result, has gained extra traction after Mark Zuckerberg appeared on a well-liked podcast hosted by Joe Rogan. Mr. Zuckerberg stated that Fb had quickly restricted entry to a adverse information story in The New York Submit about Hunter Biden weeks earlier than the election due to an F.B.I. warning to the corporate. (Each Mr. Zuckerberg and the F.B.I. have stated that the warning was usually about international interference and never particularly about Hunter Biden.)
The Occasions has recognized dozens of candidates who’ve publicly promoted this idea. Check out a few of these examples.
Others have extra usually espoused the idea that large expertise and media firms occupy a form of “ruling class” that meddled within the election. Even earlier than Mr. Zuckerberg’s interview with Mr. Rogan, Republican candidates cited as proof of interference that tales about Hunter Biden had been censored. They pointed to the Submit story, which stated {that a} laptop computer, left in a restore store by the president’s son, contained emails that might be damaging to his father.
“Large Tech performed their half: Mere weeks earlier than the election, Google, Twitter, and Fb censored explosive tales about Hunter Biden’s enterprise dealings with the Chinese language Communist Occasion,” J.D. Vance and Blake Masters, each Senate candidates, wrote in The New York Submit final yr. “Given the slender official margins in crucial swing states, tech manipulation alone probably modified the end result of the election.”
The Occasions additionally recognized no less than 50 candidates who promoted or cited “2000 Mules.” Directed by the conservative commentator Dinesh D’Souza, the film contends that a military of “mules” stuffed drop containers — a twist on what is usually known as poll trafficking or harvesting — and says these claims had been bolstered by monitoring of cellphone information, however materials within the film has been debunked by a number of organizations.
Listed below are some examples of what candidates have stated in regards to the film.
Many Republicans have latched onto a narrower procedural argument for the try final Jan. 6 to problem the Electoral Faculty vote — an episode that breathed new life into Mr. Trump’s claims of conspiracy and fraud.
These candidates have made the unorthodox argument that it was unconstitutional for states to bypass state legislatures after they modified voting procedures in the course of the pandemic, when infections had been starting to surge throughout the nation.
Some candidates have hewed near this slender constitutional argument, however others have used the argument as a springboard, accusing Democrats of harnessing the Covid pandemic to steal the election from Mr. Trump.
“I imagine that the Democrat machine took over our elections earlier than 2020 within the guise of Covid,” Karoline Leavitt, a former Trump administration official who’s working for a Home seat in New Hampshire, stated on a information program final yr. “Covid was the best reward that the Democrats ever acquired. They circumvented state legislatures throughout the nation, which is unconstitutional.”
A standard chorus amongst candidates is that they’re merely reflecting the views of their voters. Polls present a majority of Republican voters don’t imagine Mr. Biden legitimately received the election. However when the Republican outdated guard has tried to rein in these views, the efforts have crumbled shortly.
This summer season, for instance, Invoice Palatucci, a Republican Nationwide Committee member from New Jersey and an outspoken critic of Mr. Trump’s efforts to subvert the election, drafted a decision that might have denounced the concept the vp might have rejected the Electoral Faculty outcomes (although it didn’t point out Mr. Trump by title).
Mr. Palatucci spent a day lobbying members, and his effort gave the impression to be incomes some help. But it surely fell aside the following night. Help evaporated as soon as it turned clear {that a} trio of election-denying candidates in Arizona — Blake Masters, for Senate; Kari Lake, for governor; and Mark Finchem, for secretary of state — would prevail within the main.
“There was, nicely, very well mannered silence,” Mr. Palatucci stated.
In the long run, falsehoods surrounding the vote have so taken maintain of the G.O.P. that it’s tougher to seek out Republican candidates who unequivocally settle for the outcomes than those that query or reject them.
“Any candidate for public workplace who can not state forthrightly and unequivocally that the 2020 election outcomes had been legitimate, and that Jan. 6, 2021, was a violent revolt, must be deemed unqualified to serve,” Corey Gustafson, a congressional candidate working in California, stated in an interview with The San Diego Union-Tribune in August. He’s not favored to win his race.