MSNBC Visitor Reveals Liberal Coping Mechanisms For Having To Share a Nation With Conservatives

You already know, I feel I converse for all People no matter political affiliation after I say that I’ve missed former White Home Press Secretary Jen Psaki. Whereas I disagreed with most likely 99% of what she would say on the podium, she was no less than faster on her toes than her protege. Nonetheless, Karine Jean-Pierre has offered numerous content material for my articles, so I thank her.

I’ve been inquisitive about how Jen’s been doing at her new house at MSNBC, and proper on cue, i noticed her on a panel interview with The Brookings Establishment’s senior fellow Shadi Hamid.

There to advertise an upcoming occasion on the liberal-leaning assume tank, he mentioned how liberals might cope in a world with those that disagree with them.

Apparently, we reside in a world the place individuals should be reminded that they have to be taught to proceed on when there are these roaming this Earth with totally different views than you. However alas, right here we’re.

Simply take a watch, and also you’ll get an unvarnished glimpse of what the left thinks of their fellow countrymen:

Brookings’ ⁦@shadihamid⁩: “There’s, what, 74 million Trump supporters, voters? We will’t simply want them away … So then now we have to discover a method to reside with them even when we expect they’re dangerous individuals, even when we expect they’re a menace to all the pieces we maintain expensive.” pic.twitter.com/ilvpgasWDc

— Tom Elliott (@tomselliott) October 14, 2022

Oh Please

Good previous Jen Psaki introduced up the prospect that we’d find yourself having to place up with one more time period with Donald Trump or somebody like him in workplace, trembling to assume what sort of a world that will be like! So anyway, she requested Mr. Hamid:

“What classes ought to People take from what has occurred world wide if there are extentive years of a authorities in place whose preventing towards democracy and preventing towards basic rights.”

Oh brother. Mr. Hamid obliges her overly dramatic query, supporting the validity of it by invoking the current election in Italy of the dreaded Giorgia Meloni, usually in comparison with Benito Mussolini, stating reasonably precisely that:

“…that individual can have come to energy by means of elections.”

That is meant to be nicer to Trump supporters, but it surely’s nonetheless a man named Shadi Hamid treating Trump voters as interlopers that the “actual People” simply need to tolerate. https://t.co/8YY9W4gFyq

— Scott Greer 6’2” IQ 187 (@ScottMGreer) October 14, 2022

What?! Say it isn’t so? So the individuals’s will in a good election may decide to vote for a conservative politician in a free nation? Whoa, whoa, whoa, we should always examine this additional.

RELATED: The Left Used To Help Radical Free Speech. Now They Abhor It. What Occurred?

Embrace Acceptance

Now if I’m going to be trustworthy, I agree with the basics of what Mr. Hamid says subsequent. He rightly and gently explains to the MSNBC pundits:

“Now we have to simply accept that individuals that we utterly disagree with are generally going to win.”

He goes on to kick them within the intestine with the next:

“There’s, what, 74 million Trump supporters, voters? We will’t simply want them away…so then now we have to discover a method to reside with them even when we expect they’re dangerous individuals, even when we expect they’re a menace to all the pieces we maintain expensive.”

You may actually hear the dismay from Jen and the others when he stated that. Severely I’ve watched the clip about seven instances; you may hear it.

And right here is the place Mr. Hamid brings up a chilling query and one which I feel some on the left would reply in a really darkish type of manner:

“What’s the opposite choice that’s in entrance of us?”

What, certainly.

We’re not far proper. We’re populist/nationalists who reject socialism, communism & Marxism. We imagine in restricted authorities, particular person freedoms, household, religion & capitalism.

— Donine (@ms_fiberlicious) October 14, 2022

RELATED: MSNBC Host Nicolle Wallace Desires Obama-led ‘Democracy Fee’ To Save America From Republicans

Problematic Democracy?

Mr. Hamid is internet hosting an occasion subsequent week at The Brookings Establishment titled ‘The Drawback with Democracy: Islam, Liberalism, and American International Coverage.’ Throughout this dialogue subsequent week, Mr. Hamid will focus on his idea of ‘Democratic Minimalism.’

On the Brookings web site, ‘Democratic Minimalism’ is described as:

“decoupling Democracy and Liberalism when the 2 are in pressure.”

Clear as mud? I believed so. You’re in luck, although, as a result of I’m a political science and principle nerd, so I’ll break down what this argument is all about.

To grasp democratic minimalism, you first need to go over different ideas like democratic liberalism and liberalism normally. Liberalism might be not what you assume it’s; it’s not only a bunch of dudes strolling round with man buns and girls carrying hats formed like feminine genitalia protesting this or that.

Liberalism is the idea that particular person rights, civil liberties, democracy, and free enterprise ought to be promoted and that the distinction of opinions is one thing to be revered and results in new concepts. Right now we name it “classical liberalism” to indicate this ideology, most famously promoted by luminaries like Thomas Jefferson, John Locke, and others. 

It’s not American “liberalism,” as outlined by the Democrat Social gathering.

So let’s add democratic governance to that dangerous boy and see what we get.

This is likely one of the key arguments I make in my new guide. Now we have to discover ways to respect democratic outcomes even when we understand them as a menace to all the pieces we maintain expensive. That is the take a look at.https://t.co/vgitXQV7ob pic.twitter.com/QcliYpolWo

— Shadi Hamid (@shadihamid) October 14, 2022

RELATED: MSNBC’s Pleasure Reid Compares Floridians Evacuating Hurricane Ian to Unlawful Immigrants: ‘Ironic That They Must Pour Over the Borders and Go North’

Evaluating Democracies

Democratic liberalism continues to be most likely not what you assume; there are not any man buns right here, properly, possibly a couple of man buns. Democratic liberalism is the concept the individuals have energy and are energetic individuals within the governance of their nation, throughout the classical liberal framework of values.

So what’s democratic minimalism? It would sound interesting for somebody like me who lives a minimalist life-style, but it surely’s actually not, though you possibly can evaluate it.

My husband and I wish to reside fairly small; we desire to spend our cash on experiences versus issues, and in comparison with different households, we personal little or no. Democratic minimalism strips democracy all the way down to its naked bones, protecting it to guaranteeing elections… and that’s it.

I haven’t obtained my invitation to Mr. Hamid’s occasion but; it should nonetheless be within the mail, however from what I can collect, Mr. Hamid would argue that when a society is experiencing some political strife, the protections of liberalism ought to be eliminated. A spotlight solely on free elections and that’s all ought to be instituted.

Sounds ridiculous? It’s as a result of you may’t have free elections with out all that different pesky civil liberty stuff.

“MAGA Republicans symbolize an extremism that threatens the very foundations of our republic.” -Joe Biden September 1, 2022. https://t.co/Gc1Ovc4loU

— Katie Pavlich (@KatiePavlich) October 14, 2022

RELATED: 37 Years And seven Excursions In The Navy, And All We Get Is Our President Calling Us Extremist Fascists?

The Actual Drawback Isn’t Democracy

The issue that now we have isn’t our type of democracy; the issue now we have is that now we have misplaced the power to tolerate each other and to carry sure truths sacred. Folks like these on MSNBC are terrified of individuals like Ms. Meloni in Italy as a result of she believes that individuals shouldn’t need to apologize for his or her identification, together with conservatives.

I’m a girl, a mom, I imagine in God, I really like my nation, I’m a veteran, a Republican, I’m white, and I shouldn’t need to apologize for it or conceal any of it. Nonetheless, I additionally shouldn’t be judged as both good or dangerous solely primarily based on these features of my identification.

Whereas Mr. Hamid made some glorious factors, I’ve to take challenge along with his concept that democratic minimalism is a sensible reply to what ails us. As an alternative, I’d argue that we have to cease labeling one another as evil or fascists and be taught to have constructive debates.

However which celebration is it once more, Jen, that calls their opponents evil and fascists? I’m unsure I keep in mind; possibly you may remind me. Or maybe I ought to ask Ms. Jean-Pierre.

After defending calling Republicans “semi-fascists,” and “MAGA extremists,” Karine Jean-Pierre says “this isn’t about one political celebration.” pic.twitter.com/4KYKmB4fs3

— Townhall.com (@townhallcom) September 1, 2022